How far the case went

Each rung is a separate judgment by a separate authority, about a separate object; this page records what each one did and when, citing the act, and never adds them up into a verdict. For Cimbres the central finding is an absence: no formal diocesan ruling from the 1930s–40s has been located. The two documented recent acts are about different objects — the bishop's 2021 recognition of “presumíveis aparições” (presumed apparitions), and the beatification cause of one of the seers, which judges a person and not the events of 1936.

One rung per authority. "No ruling found" is a statement about the evidence, not about the case.
Step by step, with the documents

Local inquiry — the investigators on the ground 1936–1941

Investigated — concluded in favour

Fr. José Kehrle (1891–1978), secretary to the Bishop of Pesqueira, and Frei Estevam Roettger OFM (1877–1955), both acting on Bishop Adalberto Accioli Sobral's determination.

The two investigators interrogated the seers repeatedly from August 1936 and attended the reported apparitions in person, pressing for a contradiction; Kehrle separated the girls and put his questions in German and Latin, languages neither could read, on 20 August and after. The diocese's own 2021 pastoral letter records that they returned “o parecer favorável sobre os eventos e o atestado da sua veracidade” — a favourable opinion on the events and an attestation of their truthfulness. Kehrle's 1941 “Manuscripto” is that opinion, and it remains the principal source for every later account. It is an investigator's report and not a ruling: it was never published, Kehrle kept silent under obedience, and no diocesan act adopted it. Two things qualify the rung and are recorded with it. The clergy were not of one mind — Msgr. Elyseu Duarte Diniz, questioning the girls separately on 31 August 1936, declared he believed none of it, and the parish priest Fr. Manuel Marques is reported never to have believed. And the favourable opinion was not the only one the bishop received: Kehrle's diary records that in October 1936 Sobral sent the Franciscan superior and Fr. Urbano de Carvalho to examine the site, that nothing appeared to them, and that they reported the accounts untrue. Neither examination produced a located document. The diary itself is now in print in two devotional editions — Ione Paiva's book and Ana Lígia Lira's “O Inquisidor de Cimbres” (2021), which its author states transcribes it in full — and collating those against the archive copy is the open task.

[3] [1] [15] [16]

The bishop's ruling, 1930s–40s 1936–1947 (the episcopate of Dom Adalberto Accioli Sobral)

A ruling is reported; no document located

Bishop Adalberto Accioli Sobral (1887–1951), second bishop of Pesqueira, who administered the diocese from 1934 to 1947 and who ordered the inquiry.

Devotional literature reports that the Church answered in this period by rejecting the reports and imposing silence — the Heralds of the Gospel add police pressure and some fifty years of enforced silence on the seers and on Kehrle — but it produces no decree, and that characterization is its own. What better sources establish is narrower and is not a ruling: the 2023 academic study finds the cult was legitimated by its devotees “without major institutional interference from the local Curia or the Roman Curia” and describes strategies of silencing rather than an act, while the diocese's 2021 pastoral letter records “silenciamento das autoridades eclesiásticas” and the detention of Maria da Luz's father by police in 1936, then calls itself “a primeira resposta da Igreja” — the Church's first response to these events. Four episcopal actions of the period are now dated and attested, none of them a ruling: the October 1936 second examination that reported against the accounts; the police action of 20 October 1936 that destroyed the enclosure at the spring and detained Artur Teixeira, ordered in the name of the regional delegado of Pesqueira, which the town attributed to the bishop and which the bishop had Kehrle deny from the cathedral pulpit; the bishop's rebuke to Kehrle for paying a seer's school fees instead of a seminarian's; and a letter to Kehrle in 1937, quoted in the devotional edition of his papers, which says nothing about the apparitions and everything about obedience — whoever is not with the bishop is not with the Church. A private letter about authority is not a judgment on a case. So a ruling is reported and no document has been located. That is not the same as a ruling against, and this page does not record one.

No formal diocesan decree on the apparitions, favourable or adverse, has been located for the 1930s–40s. Searched, August 2026: the 2023 RBHR study, which works from Kehrle's 1941 manuscript and cites no such act; the 2016 UNICAP dissertation, which retells the whole 1936–37 sequence from that diary and likewise cites none; the 2021 pastoral letter, which reviews the history and cites none either; Catholic press; the shrine's own history; the devotional literature that asserts the rejection; and eighteen devotional videos supplied for this project in 2026, in which every speaker asserts an episcopal prohibition and not one names a decree, a protocol number or an archival reference. The 2016 dissertation adds a checked zero of its own: it found no coverage of the events in the Jornal do Commercio or the Diário de Pernambuco for August–November 1936. Three archives would settle it and none has been consulted here — the diocesan archive of Pesqueira, which holds Kehrle's manuscript and is not online; the papers of the Pesqueira police delegacy and the Pernambuco chefia de polícia, where an order for the October 1936 detention would be; and the Irmã Adélia collection donated to the Instituto RIC in Recife in July 2023.

[1] [3] [10] [15]

The bishop's judgment, 2021 — the pastoral letter 2 October 2021

Investigated — concluded in favour

Bishop José Luiz Ferreira Salles CSsR of Pesqueira, signing at Aldeia Guarda, Vila de Cimbres.

The letter is titled “A Diocese de Pesqueira e as presumíveis aparições de Nossa Senhora da Graça” — presumed apparitions — and the word does work all through it. Acting “pela autoridade que nos confere o nosso ministério episcopal”, the bishop declares that in the reported apparitions there are “elementos, traços e sinais que abalizam e sinalizam a grande probabilidade do caráter sobrenatural” of what the two girls lived; that the messages are “em profunda consonância com as verdades da fé cristã”; that this finding of great probability, while making the events worthy of credence, “não vincula ou obriga nenhum fiel a crer”; and that he grants permission for the faithful to continue the devotion. Official interpretation is reserved to the Magisterium and to the diocesan bishop, and the letter says expressly that it does not exhaust the possibility of later decisions by the competent ecclesial authorities. It is a diocesan act finding a high probability and permitting a cult — not a declaration that the apparitions are established, and not a papal act.

[3] [4]

Referral to Rome on the apparitions

No record found that this step took place

The Holy See. The 2021 pastoral letter proceeds under the Holy See's 1978 norms for discerning presumed apparitions and reserves official pronouncements on the case to the Magisterium and to the diocesan bishop of Pesqueira.

Nothing found indicates that the apparitions were ever referred to Rome or ruled on there. Searched, August 2026: the 2023 RBHR study, which concludes the cult consolidated “without major institutional interference from the local Curia or the Roman Curia”; the 2021 pastoral letter, which reviews the case at length, cites the Roman norms, reports no Roman act on it and calls itself the Church's first response; Catholic press, which presents the 2021 act as diocesan; and the Latin title variants for a curial document, logged as a verified zero in this project's KEYWORDS.md. This is recorded as “no record found” — a statement about the evidence reached — and deliberately not as “the case did not reach this step”, which would be a claim about the case itself. Settling that would take the registers of the competent dicastery, which this project has not seen; a study's finding of no interference is compatible with a Roman act that did not interfere. One further test was run in 2026 and it came back the same way. Asked on camera, in May 2021, whether the Holy See had a file on Cimbres, Ana Lígia Lira — who has worked longer in these documents than anyone outside the cause — answered that it is said so “nos bastidores”, and immediately added “mas eu não tenho provas disso, não tenho dados disso”. The tradition's own researcher reports the rumour and disclaims the evidence, which is what this rung already says.

[1] [3] [31]

Rome — the beatification cause of Irmã Adélia, a different object Nihil obstat 22–23 February 2024; diocesan phase 10 March – 13 October 2024; Roman phase from 17 October 2024

Church act on a related matter — not a ruling on the apparition

The Dicastery for the Causes of Saints, and the Diocese of Pesqueira for the diocesan phase.

This rung is about a person, not about the 1936 events. The Dicastery's nihil obstat opened the beatification and canonization cause of Irmã Adélia — Maria da Luz Teixeira de Carvalho, the younger of the two seers — which gives her the title Servant of God; Catholic press differs over whether the act fell on 22 or 23 February 2024. The diocesan phase opened on 10 March 2024 and closed on 13 October 2024, and the acts went to Rome, where the cause is under way. A cause examines a candidate's life and virtue: nothing in it is a judgment on the apparitions, and headlines of the form “the Vatican recognizes the apparition of Cimbres” misreport it. The 2021 pastoral letter had already announced that the nihil obstat was requested and awaited, treating the cause as a matter distinct from the events. The rung is here because it is the only Roman act in this file, and omitting it would leave that confusion unanswered. The diocesan acts were delivered to the Dicastery on 17 October 2024 by a delegation received in the papal audience the previous day: the congregation's superior general and provincial, the postulator Frei Jociel Gomes, and Prof. Dr. Carlos André Moura as president of the cause's historical and archival commission — the same historian who wrote the 2023 academic study this dataset leans on most, which is worth a reader's knowing. No miracle has been recognised in the cause, and none of the cures reported at Cimbres has been the object of any Church declaration.

[7] [5] [6] [3] [22]

About

Work-in-progress dataset compiled from public sources (see references). The apparitions are recorded here as REPORTED events: the dataset documents who reported what and when, and what Church authorities ruled and when — it does not assert the supernatural claim as fact. The same rule governs the cures reported at the site: the datable thing is that a cure was REPORTED, by whom and when, or that an authority RECOGNISED one — and at Cimbres no recognition of any cure has been located, so no cure is recorded here as having occurred. The scope runs from the colonial founding of Cimbres, through the 1936–37 reports and the diocesan response, to the shrine, the seers' later lives and the beatification cause now in Rome; Xukuru history is cited only where a dated event here requires it and is not this project's subject. Sourcing is thin: much of the literature is devotional and recycles itself, several dates rest on a single devotional source and are flagged with a ? mark, and where a devotional book or video is the only witness to something the dataset names the witness. Contested claims are attributed to their authors. Corrections against primary sources are welcome.

What it is
A series of Marian apparitions reported in 1936 (and, per some accounts, into 1937) by two adolescent girls at Sítio Guarda, near the village of Cimbres, municipality of Pesqueira, Pernambuco, Brazil, attributed by the devotion to Nossa Senhora das Graças (Our Lady of Grace).[1] [2]
Reported seers
Maria da Conceição Silva (1920–1999), then 16, and Maria da Luz Teixeira de Carvalho (1922–2013), then 13 — the latter later a religious sister under the name Irmã Adélia.[1] [6]
Church status
No formal diocesan ruling from the 1930s–40s has been located: a 2023 academic study concludes the devotion consolidated 'without major institutional interference from the local Curia or the Roman Curia', while devotional literature reports informal dismissal and imposed silence. The first official pronouncement came on 2 October 2021, when Bishop José Luiz Ferreira Salles of Pesqueira published a pastoral letter recognizing the 'presumíveis aparições' (presumed apparitions), stating they show 'great probability of supernatural character', and permitting the devotion. This is a diocesan act, not a papal one.[1] [4] [10]
The site today
A diocesan shrine — the Santuário de Nossa Senhora das Graças at Aldeia Guarda, Vila de Cimbres — with an annual pilgrimage feast on 31 August and a 365-step stairway up to the rock. The village and shrine lie inside the demarcated Xukuru Indigenous Land on the Serra do Ororubá. The ninetieth anniversary of the first reported apparition fell on 6 August 2026.[8] [12] [26]
Reported cures
Cures and wonders are reported at the site and attributed to Nossa Senhora das Graças, and pilgrims come for the water of the spring. None has been recognised by any Church authority: no bishop's or dicastery's declaration concerning a cure at Cimbres has been located, and the 2021 pastoral letter makes none. The earliest cure testimony that the 2016 UNICAP study can date is from the pilgrimage of 31 August 1985, and that study states it has no testimonies from the period of the apparitions themselves; Kehrle's diary claims a register kept at the Guarda in 1936 already held some six hundred, and that register has not been produced. This dataset records who reported what and when. It makes no finding that any cure occurred.[15] [3] [19]

Chronology

Key events in chronological order. A ? flag marks dates not yet verified against a primary source.

8 decades with no recorded events (1680–1759)14 decades with no recorded events (1770–1909)2 decades with no recorded events (1950–1969) 167617621910194219782026
  1. 1676 ?

    Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    An Oratorian mission is founded on the Serra do Ororubá

    Fr. João Duarte do Sacramento of the Congregation of the Oratory founds a mission among the Ararobá on the Serra do Ororubá and names it for Nossa Senhora das Montanhas — Our Lady of the Mountains. The Xukuru join the settlement in the 1690s. Two things in this chronology begin here: the Marian dedication of the place, which is older than 1936 by two and a half centuries and belongs to a different devotion; and the Indigenous village that becomes Vila de Cimbres. The 1676 date is the one local historiography gives and is not verified against a primary document here.[28] [15]

  2. 8 decades with no recorded events (1680–1759)
  3. 17621762-04-03

    Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    Cimbres is raised to a vila

    The settlement is elevated to the status of vila under the name Cimbres, the sixth in Pernambuco, with a term covering territory now divided among more than twenty municipalities. Pesqueira, in the valley below, is made a vila on 13 May 1836 and takes the municipal seat from Cimbres; from 1913 the municipality is definitively named Pesqueira and Cimbres is one of its districts. By 1936 Cimbres is a village that had once been the head of the region and no longer was.[28]

  4. 14 decades with no recorded events (1770–1909)
  5. 19101910-12-05

    Floresta, Pernambuco, Brazil

    The Diocese of Floresta is erected

    The diocese that will judge the Cimbres reports is erected as the Diocese of Floresta, in the Pernambuco sertão; its see moves to Pesqueira and it is renamed on 2 August 1918. It is a young, poor and thinly staffed diocese: in 1936 it is twenty-six years old, and the priest who conducts the inquiry is the bishop's secretary rather than a canonist or a commission.[11]

  6. 19181918-08-02

    Pesqueira, Pernambuco, Brazil

    The episcopal see is transferred to Pesqueira

    The Diocese of Floresta (created 1910) is transferred to Pesqueira, taking in the parishes of Pesqueira and Cimbres among others; the Diocese of Pesqueira is the ecclesiastical authority over all later events in this chronology.[1] [11]

  7. 19341934-01-13

    Pesqueira, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Adalberto Accioli Sobral is appointed bishop, ending a fourteen-month vacancy

    After the death of Bishop José Antônio de Oliveira Lopes on 24 November 1932 the see stands vacant for fourteen months. Adalberto Accioli Sobral is appointed on 13 January 1934 and governs Pesqueira until his transfer on 18 January 1947. The reported apparitions fall two and a half years into his episcopate, and every ecclesiastical act and non-act of the 1936–37 period is his.[11]

  8. 19361936-08-06

    Sítio Guarda, Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    First reported apparition

    Maria da Conceição Silva (16) and Maria da Luz Teixeira de Carvalho (13) report seeing a woman with a child on a rock of the Serra do Ororubá while gathering castor beans; in later reported dialogues the figure, asked who she was, answers 'Eu sou a graça' ('I am the grace'). Pilgrims begin arriving the next day, per the shrine's account.[1] [4] [8]

  9. 19361936-08-15 ?

    Pesqueira, Brazil

    The Diocese of Pesqueira opens an inquiry

    After the reports reach the diocese, Bishop Adalberto Accioli Sobral designates his secretary, Fr. José Kehrle, to investigate the events and draft an opinion (parecer) on the credibility of the accounts, following canonical procedure. Devotional transcriptions date Kehrle's first recorded interrogation of Maria da Luz to 15 August 1936.[1] [9]

  10. 19361936-08-20

    Sítio Guarda, Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    Kehrle examines the seers on the mountain

    Fr. José Kehrle goes to Sítio Guarda in person and conducts the first on-site examination, having already sent up a written note of questions built on an exorcism formula ('Quem pode mais que Deus?') because, on his own account, he feared a diabolical event. He separates the girls, questions them apart, and puts his questions in German and Latin — languages neither could read — with the answers returned in Portuguese; the accounts give some 123 questions on this day. Kehrle reported seeing nothing himself. This is the method the whole case is argued from, by its defenders and against its doubters alike.[15] [1] [19]

  11. 19361936-08-31

    Sítio Guarda, Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    Mass gathering at the site; clergy divided

    On a date the seers said the apparition itself had appointed, a crowd gathers at the site — the shrine says more than 5,000 pilgrims, Kehrle's account as narrated in the devotional literature says more than 3,000. Kehrle attends with his brother, Fr. Luiz Kehrle, and with Msgr. Elyseu Duarte Diniz; his diary records the message 'Brazil is saved, communism is not coming any more'. The same day Diniz, after questioning the girls separately, declares he believes none of it, an early sign of the split Kehrle's diary describes among clergy and faithful. Ione Paiva, the tradition's principal narrator, says in a 2025 interview that the word 'communism' enters the record through Kehrle's questions rather than through the reported messages; readers of the political material should weigh that.[1] [8] [15] [29]

  12. 19361936-09-10

    Sítio Guarda, Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    The parish priest and the Franciscan question the seers; a doctor is called in

    Fr. Manuel Marques, parish priest of Cimbres, and Frei Estevão von Roettger OFM question the seers on the mountain in Latin and German. Marques then tells Artur Teixeira in front of witnesses to take the girls to Pesqueira to be examined by a physician; Dr. Lídio Paraíba examines both and certifies in writing that their physical and mental condition showed no abnormality. The medical certificate is the one piece of non-clerical documentation the 1936 inquiry is reported to have produced, and it has not been located.[15] [17]

  13. 19361936-10 ?

    Sítio Guarda, Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    A second examination, commissioned by the bishop, reports against the reports

    Kehrle's diary records that in October Bishop Sobral sent the Franciscan superior together with Fr. Urbano de Carvalho, rector of the college, to examine the events on the spot. They climbed the mountain with the girls, nothing appeared, they concluded the accounts were untrue and reported so to the bishop. This matters for how the inquiry is described: the diocese did not receive one favourable opinion, it received a favourable one from its secretary and an adverse one from two examiners it sent afterwards. No document from either examination has been located; both are known only through Kehrle's diary as printed in the devotional literature. The month is Kehrle's; no day is given.[15] [19]

  14. 19361936-10-20

    Sítio Guarda, Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    Police destroy the enclosure at the spring and detain the seer's father

    A police detachment under a sergeant, acting in the name of the regional delegado of Pesqueira, destroys the fence and door built around the spring and places Artur Teixeira — Maria da Luz's father and the owner of the land — under arrest, to be taken to Pesqueira and from there to the chief of police in Recife. He is questioned by the regional delegado, found not to be at fault, and released the same night. This is the detention the diocese's own 2021 pastoral letter recalls; Kehrle's diary supplies the date and the sequence. Who ordered it was disputed at the time: the town said the bishop, and Kehrle was instructed by the bishop to say from the cathedral pulpit that this was a rumour. The order, if written, would be in the papers of the Pesqueira police delegacy or of the Pernambuco chefia de polícia, which this project has not seen.[15] [3] [19]

  15. 19371937-02-26 ?

    Sítio Guarda, Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    The last reported apparition at Sítio Guarda — and the accounts diverge on it

    The 2016 UNICAP study, following Kehrle's diary, dates the last reported appearance at Sítio Guarda to 26 February 1937, with a written message that ends 'Eu aparecerei em outro monte' ('I shall appear on another mountain'); reports then shift to a place called Alagadiço near Alagoinha, still in the Diocese of Pesqueira, and Kehrle sends questions there through Maria da Luz. The devotional accounts do not agree with each other: the narrated video series dates the end to 26 December 1936, Ione Paiva says February 1937 with about forty apparitions in all, and the shrine counts thirty-nine after the first. A date of 11 February 1937, which circulates in search results, was not found in the text of any source reached. The dataset records the divergence rather than choosing among them.[15] [19] [29] [32]

  16. 19371937-06 ?

    Pesqueira, Brazil

    Kehrle consults Germany, and both investigators are moved out of Pesqueira

    Uncertain whether the events were of God, Kehrle writes to Friedrich Ritter von Lama in Germany — the writer and confidant of the stigmatic Therese Neumann — asking him to put the question to her; the reply reaches him in June 1937 and is reported as favourable. He forwards it to the bishop and receives back a letter that answers nothing about the apparitions and everything about authority: those who oppose the bishop 'não poderão contar vitória', for whoever is not with the bishop is not with the Church. Around the same time Kehrle and Frei Estevão are notified of their transfers out of Pesqueira. The bishop's letter is quoted in the devotional edition of Kehrle's papers and is the nearest thing to a written episcopal position on the case located for this period — and it is a private letter about obedience, not a ruling on the reports. The Kehrle–von Lama correspondence is a documentary lead that has not been traced to an archive.[15] [19]

  17. 19401940-06-12 ?

    Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Maria da Luz enters religious life

    Maria da Luz is presented by Sra. Basinha Galindo and enters the postulancy of the Religiosas da Instrução Cristã (Damas da Instrução Cristã) at Recife; the shrine's biography dates the entry to 12 June 1940, the start of the noviciate to 14 January 1941, and the temporary vows at which she took the name Irmã Adélia to 14 January 1943, while Catholic press gives her perpetual profession as 1946. She had asked Kehrle beforehand to impose on her, as a penance, silence about the apparitions — she feared the congregation would not accept a seer — and she kept it for forty-nine years. Her fellow seer Maria da Conceição remained a laywoman. The formation dates rest on the shrine's account alone; the earlier reading of this entry, 'December 1940', came from a different devotional source.[25] [9] [6] [1] [29]

  18. 1941

    Pesqueira, Brazil

    Kehrle's favorable report is completed — and no ruling follows

    Fr. José Kehrle completes his 'Manuscripto', a diary-report concluding favorably on the reported apparitions; it becomes the principal source for later study. No formal diocesan judgment is documented: the 2023 academic study of the case concludes the cult was legitimated by devotees 'without major institutional interference from the local Curia or the Roman Curia', and describes strategies of silencing by the hierarchy — Kehrle kept his opinion unpublished under obedience. Devotional literature (Heralds of the Gospel) goes further, reporting a campaign of suppression that included police pressure and roughly fifty years of imposed silence on the seers and on Kehrle; that characterization is theirs. The manuscript itself has never been published as such, but two devotional editions now carry it in print: Ione Paiva's book, which reproduces its material alongside Irmã Adélia's own writings, and Ana Lígia Lira's 'O Inquisidor de Cimbres' (2021), which its author states is a full transcription of the diary together with Maria da Luz's letters. Collating those printings against the archive copy is the outstanding task on this case.[1] [10] [19] [16]

  19. 1942 ?

    Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    An image of Nossa Senhora das Graças is enthroned in the chapel

    Per the shrine's own history, an image of Nossa Senhora das Graças donated by Odete Berardo is enthroned in the small chapel that Arthur Teixeira de Carvalho, Maria da Luz's father, had built near the site. Single devotional source; date unverified elsewhere.[8]

  20. 2 decades with no recorded events (1950–1969)
  21. 19781978-08-06

    Buíque, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Fr. José Kehrle dies at Buíque

    Kehrle — born at Rheinstetten, Germany, on 19 May 1891, in Brazil from 1909, ordained in 1914, made a monsignor in 1964 — had been moved to Buíque in 1947, where he served as priest and unpaid physician and built a chapel, a school and a maternity hospital, all under the title Nossa Senhora das Graças. He dies there on 6 August 1978, the anniversary of the first reported apparition, and is buried in the chapel he built. He never published the report he wrote in 1941; the coincidence of the date is a staple of the devotional accounts and is recorded here as a date, not as a sign.[23] [1] [15]

  22. 1985

    Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    Irmã Adélia breaks a forty-nine-year silence

    Diagnosed with breast cancer in 1984 and, on the accounts of those around her, given a short prognosis after metastasis, Irmã Adélia asks her superior's leave to tell her community about 1936 and then joins a congregational pilgrimage to Sítio Guarda — her first return. She abandons treatment afterwards and lives a further twenty-eight years. That she was cured is what the congregation, her companion Irmã Viviane and her secretary Ione Paiva report, and what the Catholic press repeats; it is recorded here as a report, with its reporters, and no Church act has declared it. From this point organised pilgrimages of hundreds begin arriving, the first from Fortaleza brought by Frei Marcos Queiroz Câmara, and the case enters public circulation for the first time since 1937.[6] [8] [25] [29] [15]

  23. 19851985-08-31 ?

    Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    The earliest dated report of a cure attributed to the site

    The earliest cure account the 2016 UNICAP study can date is Maria Eunice do Rego Barros's, from the pilgrimage of 31 August 1985; the study states in terms that it has no testimonies from the period of the apparitions themselves and that the reports begin here. Further accounts it collects are dated 1986 to 1989 and are attributed to named individuals. Against that stands Kehrle's own diary, which claims that a register kept at the Guarda in 1936 already held some six hundred testimonies — a register nobody in the reachable literature has produced. What is recorded here is that cures were reported, by whom and when: this dataset makes no finding that any cure occurred, and no bishop or dicastery has recognised one at Cimbres.[15] [19]

  24. 1986 ?

    Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    A reported episcopal statement at the fiftieth anniversary

    Reporting on Pesqueira politics in 2020, Brasil de Fato states that at the 1986 jubilee of the reported vision Bishop Manuel Palmeira da Rocha 'admitiu o testemunho das duas crianças como verdadeiro'. No text of any such statement has been located, and the diocese's 2021 pastoral letter — which reviews the whole history — presents itself as the Church's first response. The claim is recorded as reported, with its reporter and its date; it is not treated as a Church act.[27] [3]

  25. 19881980–1993 ?

    Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    The site is decreed a sanctuary — under a bishop whose dates do not fit the reported year

    The shrine's own history states that Bishop Manoel Palmeira da Rocha of Pesqueira decreed the site the Santuário de Nossa Senhora das Graças on 20 October 1998, and the regional press repeats it. He cannot have: Palmeira da Rocha governed Pesqueira from 14 March 1980 until 26 May 1993, and the bishop in 1998 was Bernardino Marchiò. Ione Paiva, who was present, says instead that she and Irmã Adélia received the sanctuary licence from Palmeira da Rocha in 1988 and that his signed decree is reproduced in her book. Either the year or the bishop in the received account is wrong. This dataset records the act as falling in Palmeira da Rocha's episcopate, leaves the date unresolved, and notes that the decree text has not been reached — a copy is said to be printed in a book that is not sold.[8] [11] [30] [26]

  26. 19991999-01-17 ?

    Arcoverde, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Maria da Conceição Silva dies at Arcoverde

    The elder of the two seers — born at Sanharó on 23 February 1920 to José Manoel da Silva and Jesuína Maria da Conceição, and living with the Teixeira de Carvalho family from about the age of thirteen — dies at Arcoverde and is buried in the Cemitério São Cristóvão there. She stopped reporting the apparitions during 1936, returned to her family, was married by her father in a marriage that did not last, and lived in poverty; the shrine states that no beatification cause has been opened for her. The date rests on the shrine's biography alone and other devotional sources give 22 January; her life after 1936 is the thinnest-documented part of this record.[24] [31] [1]

  27. 20012001-04-30

    Pesqueira, Brazil

    The Xukuru Indigenous Land, which contains Cimbres, is homologated

    The Brazilian presidency homologates the demarcation of the 27,555-hectare Terra Indígena Xukuru on the Serra do Ororubá (decree published 2 May 2001). Vila de Cimbres and the sanctuary lie within this territory — the shrine's later history unfolds on demarcated Xukuru land, whose people also keep an older Marian devotion of their own, 'Mãe Tamain' (Nossa Senhora das Montanhas).[12] [13] [1]

  28. 20132013-10-13

    Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Irmã Adélia dies at Recife

    Maria da Luz Teixeira de Carvalho — Irmã Adélia — dies at Recife aged 90, in the congregation she had entered in 1940. She had spent the last twenty-eight years speaking about the 1936 events after forty-nine years of silence, and had worked in poor communities of Recife throughout. The date is the one the Church acts of 2024 are anchored to: the diocesan phase of her cause was deliberately closed on its eleventh anniversary.[25] [6] [1]

  29. 20212021-10-02

    Aldeia Guarda, Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    Pastoral letter recognizes the 'presumed apparitions'

    Bishop José Luiz Ferreira Salles of Pesqueira signs, at Aldeia Guarda, a pastoral letter on the 'presumíveis aparições de Nossa Senhora da Graça': it states the reported events show 'elements, traces and signs that signal the great probability of the supernatural character' of the experience, finds the messages 'in deep consonance with the truths of the Christian faith', permits the devotion, and reserves interpretation of the events to the Church's magisterium and the diocesan bishop. Catholic press describes it as the Church's first official declaration on the case in 85 years. Read against the norms the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith would publish three years later, this letter already has the shape of their ordinary favourable outcome: it permits the devotion and speaks of the "great probability" of a supernatural character without declaring one. That is close to what art. 17 of the 2024 norms calls a "Nihil obstat", and it is why this rung records a judgment on the devotion rather than on the apparitions.[4] [2] [33]

    The English Wikipedia list of Marian apparitions gives 13 October 2021 for this act — the Fátima anniversary, and a natural day to promulgate. The date carried here, 2 October, is the day the letter was signed at Aldeia Guarda per the Catholic press report cited. Signing and promulgation are different acts and both dates may be right; the disagreement is recorded, not resolved, and the letter itself would settle it.

  30. 20232023-07-31

    Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Irmã Adélia's papers are handed over for the cause

    Ione Paiva, who had kept them for some four decades, formally donates Irmã Adélia's diaries, letters, photographs and personal effects to the Instituto das Religiosas da Instrução Cristã in Recife, to serve the beatification cause. In the 2025 interview she describes six large boxes, more than ten diaries among them, and says the diaries went on to Rome and that material she was asked not to print was reserved for the Dicastery. For a case whose central problem is that its documents are unpublished and unlocated, this is a dated transfer of custody and the second archive — after the diocesan archive of Pesqueira — that would have to be consulted to settle it.[21] [29]

  31. 20242024-02-22

    Rome / Pesqueira

    Nihil obstat for Irmã Adélia's cause; she becomes 'Serva de Deus'

    The Dicastery for the Causes of Saints grants the nihil obstat for opening the beatification cause of Irmã Adélia (Maria da Luz), who thereby receives the title Servant of God. Sources differ on the exact day — 22 February (feast of the Chair of St Peter, per Canção Nova) or 23 February 2024 (per other Catholic press). The act concerns the seer's cause, not the apparitions themselves.[7] [5]

  32. 20242024-10-13

    Pesqueira, Brazil

    Diocesan phase of Irmã Adélia's cause closes

    The diocesan phase of the beatification and canonization process of Irmã Adélia, opened on 10 March 2024, is closed on 13 October 2024 — the eleventh anniversary of her death — and the acts are sent to Rome, per Catholic press.[6]

  33. 20242024-10-17

    Rome

    The acts reach Rome and the Roman phase of Irmã Adélia's cause opens

    A delegation delivers the closed diocesan acts to the Dicastery for the Causes of Saints, opening the Roman phase: present are Sister Eulália Maria, superior general of the Instituto das Religiosas da Instrução Cristã, Sister Cleonice Santos, provincial, the postulator Frei Jociel Gomes, and Prof. Dr. Carlos André Moura, president of the cause's historical and archival commission. The delegation had been received in the general audience of Pope Francis the previous day. The cause remains about a person; nothing in this act touches the 1936 events.[22] [6]

  34. 20262026-08-06

    Aldeia Guarda, Cimbres, Pesqueira, Brazil

    Ninety years: the shrine as it now stands

    The ninetieth anniversary of the first reported apparition is marked at the shrine and covered by the Pernambuco secular press. What has been built at the site over the intervening decades is modest and mostly by donation: a chapel below, a 365-step stairway with a handrail up to the rock where the reported figure was seen, retaining walls, shelter for pilgrims, and the Mirante do Cruzeiro viewpoint opened in 2005 at 744 metres. Mass is celebrated in the open beside the chapel; the annual feast falls on 31 August; Fr. Mailson Régis de Queirós CSsR took over as rector in January 2026. The site remains inside the demarcated Xukuru Indigenous Land.[26] [8]

Key figures

Irmã Adélia (Maria da Luz Teixeira de Carvalho)

16 December 1922 – 13 October 2013 · Brazil

Reported seer, aged 13 in 1936; entered the Religiosas da Instrução Cristã in 1940 and took the name Irmã Adélia; kept silence about the apparitions for forty-nine years, spoke publicly from 1985, worked in poor communities of Recife; declared Servant of God in 2024[1] [6] [25]

Maria da Conceição Silva

23 February 1920 – 17 January 1999 · Brazil

Reported seer, aged 16 in 1936; born at Sanharó and living with the Teixeira de Carvalho family; stopped reporting the apparitions during 1936 and returned to Arcoverde, where she lived in poverty and died. No beatification cause has been opened for her, and her life after 1936 is the thinnest-documented part of this record[1] [24]

Fr. José Kehrle

19 May 1891 – 6 August 1978 · Germany / Brazil

German-born secretary of the Diocese of Pesqueira; conducted the 1936 diocesan inquiry, questioning the seers in German and Latin, and authored the favourable 'Manuscripto' (1941), the principal source on the events. Never published it; moved to Buíque in 1947 and died there on the anniversary of the first reported apparition[1] [23]

Dom Adalberto Accioli Sobral

1887–1951 · Brazil

Bishop of Pesqueira 1934–1947; ordered the inquiry. Devotional literature reports he personally dismissed the case; the academic study records no formal ruling by him either way[1] [11] [10]

Frei Estevão von Roettger, OFM

1877–1955 · Germany / Brazil

Franciscan who conducted complementary questioning of the seers; devotional and Catholic-press accounts report his diary attested to the events' authenticity[1] [4]

Dom José Luiz Ferreira Salles, CSsR

Brazil

Bishop of Pesqueira; author of the 2 October 2021 pastoral letter recognizing the 'presumed apparitions' and petitioner for Irmã Adélia's cause[4] [5]

Ione Maria Cavalcanti Paiva

Brazil

Teacher and author of 'Aqui o Céu encontra-se com a Terra' (1st ed. 1987/1990; 10th ed. 2024), the book most Cimbres media narrates. Irmã Adélia's secretary from 1985 and the keeper of her papers for four decades, which she donated to the Instituto RIC in 2023. A participant in the devotion, not an independent observer of it — her book is the tradition's account of itself, and this dataset cites it as such[19] [21] [29]

Ana Lígia Lira

Brazil

Journalist with a master's in regional history; author of 'O Diário do Silêncio' (2018) and 'O Inquisidor de Cimbres' (2021), the latter presented by its author as a full transcription of Kehrle's diary and Maria da Luz's letters. Worked from the documents held by the Damas da Instrução Cristã, in parallel with Dom Rafael Maria Francisco da Silva OSB. Devotional perspective, stated as such[17] [16] [31]

Carlos André Silva de Moura

Brazil

Historian at the Universidade de Pernambuco and lead author of the 2023 study of Kehrle's diary, the strongest academic source in this dataset. He is also president of the historical and archival commission of Irmã Adélia's beatification cause, and delivered the diocesan acts in Rome in October 2024 — recorded here because a reader weighing the study should know its author holds a role in the cause[1] [22]

Dom Manuel Palmeira da Rocha

1919– · Brazil

Bishop of Pesqueira from 14 March 1980 to 26 May 1993; the bishop under whom the devotion was permitted again after 1985 and to whom the sanctuary decree is attributed. The date usually given for that decree, 20 October 1998, falls five years after his episcopate ended[11] [8] [30]

Related organizations

Disambiguation & nuance

An obscure, mostly devotional literature surrounds this subject; the distinctions below are the ones most often flattened in it.

Approved for pilgrimage is not the same as approved as an apparition — and that is the Church's rule, not this page's

A shrine, a crowned image, a feast, indulgences, a papal visit: it is reasonable to read all that as the Church saying the apparition happened. It is not what the Church says it is doing, and since 2024 it says so in writing. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith's "Norms for Proceeding in the Discernment of Alleged Supernatural Phenomena" (17 May 2024) sets out six possible conclusions, and art. 23 makes the position explicit: "as a rule, neither the Diocesan Bishop, nor the Episcopal Conferences, nor the Dicastery will declare that these phenomena are of supernatural origin", though the Pope may authorise a special procedure. The ordinary favourable outcome is now "Nihil obstat", which art. 17 defines as acknowledging "many signs of the action of the Holy Spirit" in a spiritual experience "without expressing any certainty about the supernatural authenticity of the phenomenon itself". The document's own presentation adds that most shrines "have never had an official declaration of the supernatural nature of the events". The reason is what a private revelation is. Public revelation closed with the apostles, so no apparition adds an article of faith, and even an approved one obliges no one to believe — the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith said exactly that when it published the third part of the Fátima secret in 2000. What a bishop is actually asked is a pastoral question: is this devotion safe, is it free of doctrinal error, is it bearing good fruit? That can be answered yes without answering the historical question, and usually is. The same acts are granted to devotions with no apparition behind them at all — Our Lady of the Rosary and Our Lady of Mount Carmel have feasts, crowned images and basilicas, and there is no reported apparition to approve. So this page is not withholding approval; it is saying who gave which one, about what. Where a bishop did rule on an apparition, the ladder says so in his own words and marks the rung favourable — Lourdes 1862 and La Salette 1851 are quoted verbatim, Fátima 1930 is cited to its pastoral letter. What the ladder refuses to do is upgrade a crown into a verdict. If it did, a case a bishop examined and endorsed would look identical to a case nobody ever ruled on, because both have pilgrims; and the reverse error would follow just as easily, reading a Roman act against one seer's later writings as Rome condemning the apparition. Keeping the objects apart is the only way the chart carries information at all. Where the sources themselves say the Church's recognition is "implicit", the page records that word too, and does not promote it.[33]

Cimbres 1936 ≠ the Miraculous Medal (Paris, 1830)

'Nossa Senhora das Graças' is also the Brazilian title of Our Lady of Graces of the Miraculous Medal (Rue du Bac, Paris, 1830). The Cimbres devotion uses the same title — per the inquiry records because the reported figure answered 'Eu sou a graça' — but it is a distinct reported apparition with its own history.[1]

The 2021 'recognition' is diocesan, not a Vatican approval of the apparitions

The 2 October 2021 act is a pastoral letter of the Bishop of Pesqueira on 'presumed apparitions' asserting 'great probability' of supernatural character. The 2024 Vatican act (the Dicastery for the Causes of Saints' nihil obstat) concerns Irmã Adélia's beatification cause, not the apparitions — despite press headlines such as 'Vatican recognizes apparition'.[4] [7]

Documented silence ≠ a published condemnation

Devotional tradition speaks of early Church rejection of Cimbres. What the sources actually show is narrower: no formal decree — negative or positive — has been located for the 1930s–40s; the academic study documents informal dismissal, non-publication of Kehrle's favorable report, and strategies of silencing, and devotional literature adds (on its own authority) police pressure and decades of imposed silence. This dataset records that absence rather than inventing a ruling.[1] [10]

Mãe Tamain ≠ Nossa Senhora das Graças de Cimbres

The Xukuru devotion to Nossa Senhora das Montanhas, called 'Mãe Tamain', predates 1936 and is the patroness of the local parish; it is distinct from the 1936 apparition devotion, though both share the same mountain.[1] [12]

A reported cure is not a recognised miracle

Cures are reported at Cimbres in quantity, and they are told in the same breath as the bishop's acts. They are not the same kind of thing. A cure enters this dataset only as a dated report with a named reporter, or as a Church act recognising it — and at Cimbres there is no such act, for any cure, by any authority. The 1985 recovery of Irmã Adélia is the case in point: it is central to the devotion, it is what her congregation and her secretary report, and it has never been the object of a declaration. Cures are also deliberately absent from the approval ladder, which is about judgments on the apparitions.[15] [6] [3]

The sanctuary decree's usual date cannot be right as told

Almost every account, the shrine's own included, dates the sanctuary decree to 20 October 1998 and attributes it to Bishop Manoel Palmeira da Rocha. His episcopate ran from 1980 to 26 May 1993. Ione Paiva, who says she received the licence with Irmã Adélia and that the signed decree is printed in her book, gives 1988. Something in the received account is wrong, and the dataset says so rather than repeating it.[8] [11] [30]

The books behind the videos, and why they matter more than the videos

The devotional video material on Cimbres is largely a narration of four books: Ione Paiva's 'Aqui o Céu encontra-se com a Terra' (1987/1990, 10th ed. 2024), Ana Lígia Lira's 'O Diário do Silêncio' (2018) and 'O Inquisidor de Cimbres' (2021), and Dom Rafael Maria Francisco da Silva OSB's 'Eu sou a Graça' (2016) — with, behind all of them, Fr. Kehrle's diary and Frei Estevão's. The books are devotional too, and two of the four are by participants; but they are citable, paginated and checkable in a way a video is not, and Lira's 2021 volume claims to print the diary in full. Where this dataset repeats something the videos say, it says who said it.[19] [16] [17] [18]

References

33 sources · 33 with an Internet Archive fallback. Sources span the spectrum of perspectives by design; contested claims are attributed to their authors.

  1. O processo inquisitorial das aparições marianas em Cimbres: uma análise do Diário do Padre José Kehrle (1936) · 🗄 archived 2024-07-11 Revista Brasileira de História das Religiões (ANPUH), XVI:46, 2023 — Moura & Lopes Neto · academic Peer-reviewed academic study, the strongest source reached for this dataset; based on Kehrle's 1941 manuscript in the diocesan archive.
  2. Aparições de Cimbres · 🗄 archived 2025-12-14 Wikipédia (pt) · encyclopedia
  3. Carta Pastoral: A Diocese de Pesqueira e as presumíveis aparições de Nossa Senhora da Graça (Orientações espirituais e pastorais) · 🗄 archived 2022-11-16 Diocese de Pesqueira — Subsídios Pastorais 1, Pesqueira, 2 October 2021 · official The act itself, published by the diocese that issued it — primary for the 2021 declaration's wording, date and scope. Confessional by nature: it is the bishop's own account of the case as well as his judgment on it.
  4. Bispo de Pesqueira reconhece 'presumíveis aparições' de Nossa Senhora em Cimbres · 🗄 archived 2025-12-10 ACI Digital · news EWTN's Portuguese-language Catholic news agency — a confessional outlet, cited here for its report of the bishop's act, not as an independent judgment of it.
  5. Irmã Adélia, vidente de Cimbres, é serva de Deus · 🗄 archived 2025-07-11 ACI Digital · news EWTN's Portuguese-language Catholic news agency — a confessional outlet, cited here for its report of the bishop's act, not as an independent judgment of it.
  6. Fase diocesana do processo de beatificação de irmã Adélia chega ao fim · 🗄 archived 2025-12-09 ACI Digital · news EWTN's Portuguese-language Catholic news agency — a confessional outlet, cited here for its report of the bishop's act, not as an independent judgment of it.
  7. Irmã Adélia é reconhecida como 'Serva de Deus' pelo Vaticano · 🗄 archived 2026-02-13 Canção Nova Notícias · news Brazilian Catholic media — a confessional outlet, cited for its reporting of dated acts rather than as an independent assessment.
  8. História do Santuário · 🗄 archived 2025-07-21 Santuário Nossa Senhora das Graças — Cimbres · web The shrine's own account — devotional perspective, and the only source for several dates (1942 enthronement, 1998 sanctuary decree). The site returns 403 to non-browser clients; it loads with a normal browser User-Agent.
  9. Cimbres — Aparições de Nossa Senhora · 🗄 archived 2025-07-16 Salve Maria Imaculada · web A devotional site, labeled as such: a compilation carrying transcriptions of the interrogations; used only for detail dates, always flagged.
  10. As aparições em Cimbres — Um maternal aviso · 🗄 archived 2026-08-10 Revista Arautos do Evangelho (The magazine of the Heralds of the Gospel — a devotional perspective, cited as such.) · news
  11. Diocese of Pesqueira · 🗄 archived 2025-11-12 Catholic-Hierarchy.org · database A reference database of dioceses and their ordinaries, compiled from the Holy See's published appointment notices; useful for episcopal dates, not a Church act in itself. Cited here for one thing the devotional literature gets wrong: Manuel Palmeira da Rocha's episcopate ended on 26 May 1993, which the shrine's 1998 decree date cannot be reconciled with.
  12. Xukuru — Povos Indígenas no Brasil · 🗄 archived 2026-05-20 Instituto Socioambiental · encyclopedia An independent research organization documenting Indigenous territories; cited for the Xukuru context, not for the apparition claim.
  13. Caso Povo Indígena Xucuru e seus membros vs. Brasil — Resumo oficial da sentença de 5 de fevereiro de 2018 · 🗄 archived 2024-05-28 Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos (The court's own official summary of the judgment — primary for the ruling's date and content.) · legal
  14. A vidente Irmã Adélia que viu Nossa Senhora das Graças em Cimbres, Pernambuco · 🗄 archived 2026-08-10 Aleteia · news Catholic media — a confessional outlet, cited for its reporting of dated acts rather than as an independent assessment.
  15. Maria, Mariana na Serra do Ororubá – PE (1936-2016) · 🗄 archived 2026-08-24 Múcio Rodrigues Barbosa de Aguiar Neto — dissertação de mestrado em Ciências da Religião, Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP), Recife, 2016 · academic Supervised by Prof. Sylvana Maria Brandão de Aguiar. A university master's dissertation, and the fullest scholarly narrative of the 1936–37 sequence reached for this dataset: it retells the events from Fr. Kehrle's diary as printed in Ione Paiva's book, and its third chapter collects the cure testimonies. Sympathetic in tone and dependent on a devotional edition for its primary material — it is a study of the tradition's own account, not an independent verification of it. Published commercially in 2018 as 'Aparições e milagres de Nossa Senhora em Cimbres: entre a fé e as ciências' (Novas Edições Acadêmicas).
  16. O Inquisidor de Cimbres: a história do padre que recebia flores de Nossa Senhora · 🗄 archived 2026-08-24 Ana Lígia Lira — Juazeiro do Norte: Editora Apascentar, 2021, 296 pp., ISBN 978-65-995525-2-6 · book Devotional research, and the single most consequential item in this bibliography: the author states the book transcribes Fr. José Kehrle's diary and Maria da Luz's letters in full. If that holds, the 1941 'Manuscripto' that this whole case rests on — held in the diocesan archive of Pesqueira and not online — exists in print. Cited here as a lead to be collated against the archive, not as the archive. The publisher's own shop was unreachable in August 2026; linked via a book database.
  17. O Diário do Silêncio: o alerta da Virgem Maria contra o comunismo no Brasil · 🗄 archived 2022-06-13 Ana Lígia Lira — Editora Ecclesiae, 2018, 252 pp., ISBN 978-85-84911-04-2 · book Devotional perspective, by a journalist with a master's in regional history who worked from the documents held by the Damas da Instrução Cristã. The subtitle states the book's frame — the apparitions as a warning against communism — and that frame is the author's. The publisher's site returns 403 to non-browser clients. A fourth edition was launched in Pesqueira.
  18. Eu sou a Graça: as aparições de Nossa Senhora das Graças em Pernambuco · 🗄 archived 2026-04-15 Dom Rafael Maria Francisco da Silva OSB — Editora Ecclesiae, 2016, 352 pp., ISBN 85-84910-34-4 · book A Benedictine of the Mosteiro de São Bento de Olinda with a doctorate in Mariology from the Marianum in Rome; the theological counterpart to Lira's historical work, the two authors having researched the same documents in parallel. Devotional and confessional by design. Linked through the launch notice published by the Santuário Nacional de Aparecida's outlet, the publisher's own page being bot-blocked.
  19. Aqui o Céu encontra-se com a Terra · 🗄 archived 2026-06-07 Ione Maria Cavalcanti Paiva — Recife: Gráfica Barreto, 1990 · book The underlying written account that most Cimbres media narrates. Its author was Irmã Adélia's secretary from 1985, kept her papers for four decades, and wrote at her request; the book reproduces Kehrle's diary material alongside Adélia's own messages. Devotional in the strongest sense — a participant's book, distributed free rather than sold — and the source the 2016 UNICAP dissertation cites as its primary. Every page-level citation in this dataset that runs through it is marked as doing so. A first edition appeared in 1987/1988 and a tenth, revised and enlarged, in May 2024; the 2016 dissertation cites the 1987 printing, which is the pagination its quotations follow.
  20. Irmã Adélia — publicações e biografia (site oficial da causa) · 🗄 archived 2026-06-07 Instituto das Religiosas da Instrução Cristã (Instituto RIC) / Rede Damas Educacional · web The site of the congregation promoting the beatification cause — an interested party, cited for the bibliography it lists and the acts it reports, not as an assessment of them.
  21. Cerimônia de doação de registros históricos de irmã Adélia ao Instituto é celebrada · 🗄 archived 2026-08-10 Instituto das Religiosas da Instrução Cristã, 2023 · web The receiving institution's own report of the donation — primary for the date and the contents, confessional about their meaning.
  22. Processo de beatificação e canonização de Irmã Adélia avança no Vaticano com entrega de documentos e encontro com o Papa Francisco · 🗄 archived 2026-04-16 Associação Nacional de Educação Católica do Brasil (ANEC), 2024 · news A Catholic education association reporting on a congregation in its network — confessional, cited for the dated acts and the names of the cause's officers.
  23. Pe. Joseph Kehrle · 🗄 archived 2026-01-07 Santuário Nossa Senhora das Graças — Cimbres · web The shrine's biographical page — devotional, and internally imprecise (it prints his birth year as 1981). Used for the posts and dates it gives where they agree with other accounts, and flagged where they do not.
  24. Maria da Conceição Silva · 🗄 archived 2026-08-24 Santuário Nossa Senhora das Graças — Cimbres · web The shrine's biographical page for the elder seer — the only reachable source giving her birthplace, parents, death date and burial place; devotional, and single-sourced for all of them.
  25. Irmã Adélia — biografia e datas · 🗄 archived 2026-08-24 Santuário Nossa Senhora das Graças — Cimbres · web The shrine's biographical page, and the most precise reachable list of the dates of her religious formation (postulancy, noviciate, vows). Devotional; the formation dates are not independently confirmed.
  26. Aparição de Nossa Senhora das Graças em Cimbres completa 90 anos de devoção · 🗄 archived 2026-08-10 Diario de Pernambuco, 1 August 2026 — Adelmo Lucena · news A secular regional daily, and one of the few non-confessional outlets to cover the case; cited for the shrine's present configuration and for the pilgrimage. It repeats the shrine's own 1998 decree date without checking it.
  27. A saga da eleição que não acabou em Pesqueira (PE): o cacique Xukuru, a santa e o TSE · 🗄 archived 2025-12-26 Brasil de Fato, 14 December 2020 · news An independent left-wing outlet, writing about Pesqueira politics rather than about the devotion; cited only for its report of a 1986 episcopal statement and for the distinction it draws between the shrine's pilgrims and the Xukuru devotion to Mãe Tamain.
  28. Pesqueira (Pernambuco) · 🗄 archived 2025-12-24 Wikipédia (pt) · encyclopedia Used only for the colonial and municipal chronology of Cimbres and Pesqueira, where it agrees with the local historiography; not used for anything about the apparitions.
  29. Aparições de Nossa Senhora em Cimbres — Irmã Adélia, Serva de Deus (Entre 3 Atos #020, com Ione Paiva) · 🗄 archived 2026-09-07 Jornada Infinita (YouTube) · video Devotional commentary, labeled as such, recorded at the Damas da Instrução Cristã convent in Recife — a long interview with the author of the tradition's principal book. Cited only for what Ione Paiva herself asserts, as an attributed position, never as evidence that the asserted thing happened. Transcript preserved in the project archive (auto-captions, cleaned); proper names in it are unreliable.
  30. Aparição de Cimbres e as profecias de Nossa Senhora para o Brasil (Ep. #252, com Ione Paiva) · 🗄 archived 2026-09-27 Anima Podcast (YouTube) · video Devotional commentary, labeled as such. Its framing — the reported messages read as prophecy for Brazil — is the speakers' and is recorded here only as what the tradition holds. Cited for Ione Paiva's dating of the sanctuary decree, which differs from the shrine's. Transcript preserved in the project archive.
  31. Live com Ana Lígia Lira — Aparições de Nossa Senhora das Graças em Cimbres (May 2021) · 🗄 archived 2026-09-07 Felipe Rinaldo Queiroz (YouTube) · video Devotional commentary, labeled as such. Cited for two things the author says about her own research: the archive she worked in, and — asked whether Rome has a file on Cimbres — her answer that it is said so 'nos bastidores' but 'não tenho provas disso, não tenho dados disso'. Transcript preserved in the project archive.
  32. Aparições de Nossa Senhora da Graça de Cimbres — série em capítulos (playlist, chapters 1–11, 13, 14) · 🗄 archived 2026-09-21 rezar e amar (YouTube), c. 2023 · video Devotional commentary, labeled as such: a chapter-by-chapter narration whose first chapter names its own sources — Dom Rafael Maria's and Ana Lígia Lira's books, and behind them Kehrle's and Frei Estevão's papers. Chapter 12 is absent from the playlist as published; chapters 11 and 13 leave a gap covering the events between mid-September 1936 and the end of the reported apparitions. Transcripts preserved in the project archive.
  33. Norms for Proceeding in the Discernment of Alleged Supernatural Phenomena (17 May 2024) · 🗄 archived 2026-07-24 Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Holy See · official The Church's current procedure for judging reported apparitions, in force since 19 May 2024; its art. 27 entirely replaces the norms of 25 February 1978. Read in full for this dataset. Cited here for the rule it states rather than for anything it decides about this case: it is not applied retroactively, and no case in this chronology was judged under it.