Tariqa Maryamiyya
Olavo de Carvalho leaves the order after a rupture with Schuon; the sources disagree on the date — 1987 (Bunker da Cultura), 'the late 1980s' (Sedgwick), or an expelled-1987–91 window (the Jardim series) — and on the reasons, with his own published framing (the multiconfessional rule, in 'Influências discretas') differing from the hostile accounts; every version is attributed. He reinvents himself, in Sedgwick's phrase, as a Catholic-identifying 'post-Traditionalist'. Carvalho's own tellings in the Curso Online de Filosofia are a fourth attributed account, and they diverge from each other, which is itself the finding. In aula 094 (12 February 2011) he framed the ending as his own act — when he broke with these people, he said, they activated the order's customary judicial harassment, inventing a case accusing him of a crime he had not committed which cost him six years and nearly ruined him before he won it; he added that the accusation he suffered came at forty (he was born in 1947), and that all of it was more than twenty years earlier. In aula 218 (31 August 2013), reading out a critic's summary that had him expelled from the Maryamiyya, he said that this checked out perfectly, that he had already explained the circumstances, and that he holds the whole correspondence; in the same lecture he said that one cannot leave a tariqa of one's own accord — either the man puts you out or you never leave. In aula 241 (1 March 2014) he repeated the six-year lawsuit and said the order's usual practice was judicial harassment, which it could not press further in Brazil because it had only eight disciples there. A third dated telling, in aula 242 (15 March 2014), supplies a cause the 2013 one did not: he said he had left expelled from the [[tariqa]] for quarrelling with the shaykh, and in the same passage that the order he had belonged to was Schuon's, which hated Freemasonry and put out anyone who went near it. That passage also appears to give the length of his membership as a year and a half — a figure that does not sit easily with an entry in 1986 and a break at the end of the 1980s — but the sentence is elliptical in a transcription never checked against the audio, and it is recorded here as an open question rather than as a duration. In aula 279 (17 January 2015) he said that Schuon, late in life and under pressure from other tariqas, decreed that only Muslims would be accepted: a dated restatement of the multiconfessional rule that his own published account gives as his reason for leaving, although in the lecture he neither dates the decree nor ties it to his own departure. Break-by-his-own-act and expulsion are not the same claim, and he made both; the year remains unfixed and the dateVerified flag stays down. Nothing here is quoted — the corpus text has not been checked against the audio.